Print ISSN:-2394-4781

Online ISSN:-2394-4994


Current Issue

Year 2020

Volume: 7 , Issue: 2

Article Access statistics

Viewed: 713

Emailed: 0

PDF Downloaded: 245

Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia


Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Author Details : Dr. Deepti Yadav, Dr. Sadik Mohammed, Dr. U D Sharma, Dr. Rakesh Karnawat, Dr. Ghansham Biyani

Volume : 1, Issue : 1, Year : 2014

Article Page : 4-12

Suggest article by email


 Background: The LMA CTrachTM system is a new device for airway management and endotracheal intubation under direct vision in both anticipated and unexpected difficult intubation situations. This randomized controlled study was undertaken to compare the hemodynamic effects, ease of intubation, time taken for intubation, upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation through LMA CTrachTM with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscope.
Material and Method: Eighty adult patients of age 16-72 years and ASA I and ASA II grade scheduled to undergo elective surgery under GA were randomly allocated to one of the group i.e. Group A: LMA CTrachTM (Laryngeal Mask Airway CTrachTM) and Group B: DLS (Direct Laryngoscopy). The patients were intubated orally using either equipment after induction of general anaesthesia.
Results: In both the groups, there was a significant increase in heart rate and blood pressure from base line values after tracheal intubation. The rise in heart rate and SBP was significantly more in group B as compared to group A. The success rate of intubation were comparablein both the groups. The time required for successful intubation was significantly more in group A as compared to group B. The upper airway injury was more in group A than in group B.
Conclusion: LMA CTrachTM can be used for tracheal intubation with equal success rate as of DLS in patient with normal airway though it is more time consuming. It offers advantage over DLS for minimizing hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation in normotensive patients.

Keywords: LMA CTrachTM, endotracheal intubation, hemodynamic response, upper airway morbidity.

How to cite : Yadav D D, Mohammed D S, Sharma D U D, Karnawat D R, Biyani D G, COMPARISON OF INTUBATION BY LMA CTRACH VS INTUBATION BY DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY IN PATIENT WITH NORMAL AIRWAY. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2014;1(1):4-12

Copyright © 2014 by author(s) and Indian J Clin Anaesth. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) (