Reviewer Resources

What is Peer Review

Peer review is the process by which a group of individuals (peers) with similar competencies and working evaluate each other's work. The process of evaluating a manuscript's quality prior to publication is called peer review. To assist editors in deciding whether an article should be publi [read more]

Benefits for Reviewers

Although reviewing a manuscript is a tedious process, peer review fosters the caliber of published research and has various advantages for reviewers as well as the scientific community. The following are some of the core advantages of becoming a reviewer: • Peer review volunteer [read more]

Invitation to Join Innovative Volunteer Reviewer

The publication process depends on manuscript reviews, and reviewing manuscripts will make you learn a lot about scientific publishing. We cordially invite you to become a member of our journal review team. Please register using the MPRP Portal (Manuscript Peer Review Proce [read more]

Invitation to Reviewers

At least two subject experts review manuscripts submitted to the journal. Reviewers are required to assess the paper's quality and advise the external editor on whether a submission should be rejected, accepted, or require significant or minor revisions. Reviewers [read more]

Peer Review Checklist

S. NoParticulars  Details Description1.TitleDoes the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript? Is the title complete? 2.AbstractDoes the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?3.KeywordsDo the keywords reflect the focus of the manuscript?4. [read more]

Review Structure

Is the manuscript clearly laid out? It should be check properly whether key elements are addressed appropriately or not? Consider each element in turn: 1. Title: Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript? Is the title complete? 2. Abstract: Does the abstr [read more]

Peer Review Process

The peer review process can be generally outlined in several steps, though these steps vary somewhat from Journal to Journal as indicated in the diagram below.  Feedback: “Reviewers must keep in mind that they represent the journal's readership.” “Will t [read more]

Reviewer Overall Recommendation

Please provide a general suggestion regarding the publication of the manuscript as described: • Accept Paper in Present Form: The manuscript is accepted without any further changes. • Accept Paper After Minor Revisions: The manuscript is essentially accepted following revisions according [read more]

What is ORCID?

ORCID offers researchers a distinct digital identifier. Publishers, authors, editors, funding bodies, and institutions can utilize these identifiers to reliably recognize individuals similarly to how ISSNs and DOIs identify journals and articles. The OR [read more]

Conflict of Interests

Innovative request that reviewers notify the journal editor if they have a conflict of interest that could influence the review report, whether positively or negatively. The editorial office team will verify as thoroughly as possible prior to the invitation, but we value the assistance [read more]

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Guidelines

Peer reviewers are essential for upholding the integrity and standard of research. Therefore, it is crucial to tackle this obligation with openness and caution.  AI tools should not be utilized for processing or evaluating submitted manuscripts, including for language enhancement. Subm [read more]

Reviewer Resources

“Ensuring the quality of research publications is our objective,” our Training and Support team consistently strives for high-quality journal content. We have created a summary of a video clips series to aid peer review learning. These self-learning modules are accessible 24 hours a day, 7 d [read more]