Publication Decisions: The editors are responsible for making decisions on a manuscript including acceptance, rejections, or modifications. In some instances, the editors may require multiple rounds of reviews and modifications. The editors should communicate review results within the timeframe and should always be ready to work on corrections, clarifications, retractions to maintain the integrity of the academic record.
Fair Review Process: The editor's decision to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based only on the paper’s importance, originality, clarity, and study relevance to the journal. The editor must ensure that each manuscript submitted to the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy. The decisions will be based on the paper's importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal's scope.
Confidentiality: The editor and editorial staff always ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor and members of the editorial board of the journal should contact the journal coordinator in case of any personal and professional conflicts. They should not use unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his/her own research without the author’s explicit written consent.
Quality of published content: Editors should take all reasonable steps to ensure the quality of the material they publish, recognizing the journal and sections within journals with different aims and standards. Editors should not reverse their given decisions unless some serious problems are identified with the submission.
For more details about editor’s roles & responsibilities, kindly visit Editors Guidelines.
Authors must follow the submission guidelines of the journal and should follow the below mentioned rules & regulations:
For more details about authors instructions, roles & responsibilities, kindly visit our Authors Guidelines.
Confidentiality: Reviewers must keep all manuscripts received for reviewing as confidential. Any manuscripts received for review are confidential documents and must be treated as such, they must not be shown to or discussed with others.
Objectives and Standards: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate.
Conflicts of Interest: Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, and other relationships or connections with any of the authors, associated institutions, and companies with the paper(s).
Promptness: in the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for his/her to complete the review of the manuscript within the stipulated time he/she should notify the editor in a timely manner and withdraw from the review process.
Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have cited all relevant published work referred to the paper in the endnotes and bibliography. Reviewers will bring to the editors’ attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript and any other published or unpublished content. Authors should not use information obtained in the course of providing confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications unless they have obtained the explicit written permission of the author(s) of the work involved in the review.
Review evaluation: Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on content without regard to the authors’ race, age, gender, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability, religious belief, citizenship, political orientation, or social class.
We follow the latest Core Practice Guidelines for Editors, Reviewers, Authors, and Publishers as outlined by the COPE.
54
Total No of Journals
22322
Published Papers
89798
Manuscript Submission
12286156
Articles Downloaded
27083098
Articles
Viewed